The Crown Index is Market Kings’ proprietary 0–100 risk-adjusted scoring engine. It evaluates profitability, risk, consistency, execution, leverage, and compliance before penalties and the battle’s ranking model are applied.
Crown Index
How you are actually scored.
The Crown Index is a proprietary 0–100 risk-adjusted scoring engine. It combines Profitability (30%), Drawdown Control (22%), Risk Management (18%), Trade Consistency (18%), Execution Quality (7%), Leverage Discipline (5%), and a tracked Behavioral Score (0%), then applies penalties and ranking rules.
First, each of the seven components receives a 0–100 score. Second, the active weights produce a raw score. Third, applicable penalties are deducted and hard violations determine eligibility. Finally, the result is bounded from 0 to 100 and ranked using the battle’s absolute or percentile model.
Your trading activity and account snapshots feed the scoring engine during the battle. The final Crown Index and leaderboard rank are produced after component scoring, weighted aggregation, penalty review, and the configured normalization process.
Each battle and mission is scored under the algorithm version and configuration assigned to that event. Once final results use a version, that configuration is locked so the historical result remains auditable.
Profitability is 30% of the raw score, not the whole score. A deeper drawdown, risk above target, unstable results, weak execution, excessive leverage, or an active penalty can outweigh profitable returns.
Yes. The score breakdown shows the seven component results, raw score, visible deductions, eligibility status, and final normalized score when results are finalized.
No. The engine measures results and compliance rather than naming a preferred style. Every approach is assessed against the same active profitability, drawdown, risk, consistency, execution, leverage, activity, and penalty rules.
The Trade Consistency component uses an activity factor based on a minimum of five trades across two active trading days. Falling below the minimum can reduce consistency and trigger a Minimum Trades deduction of up to 20 points.
Subtractive deductions cover minimum trades, martingale behavior, revenge trading, margin stress, tail risk, and incomplete data. Hard violations — inactivity, extreme leverage, restricted instruments, or a rule violation — can make a trader ineligible and force the score to zero.
Ties resolve in this order: eligibility, normalized score, raw score before penalties, lower maximum drawdown, higher net return ratio, earlier final activity time, then participant ID as the final fallback.